| dc.contributor.author | Sipra N | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Sharif H L | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T08:16:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T08:16:10Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/175816 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/1/514 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This case provides a sequel to Case A (LUMS No. 16-081-91-1). The second appeal by the firm had also been dismissed by the Appellate Court. The MD had to devise a mode of action. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | YES | en_US |
| dc.subject | Construction | |
| dc.subject.classification | Business,Government,International Economy | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | taxation | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | business law | en_US |
| dc.title | TAX MAN COMETH (B) | en_US |
| dc.type | 16-082-91-1 | en_US |
| dc.location | case research centre | en_US |
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||