Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/1/499
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSipra Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorSharif H Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T08:16:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-30T08:16:09Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/175815-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/1/499-
dc.description.abstractThe case provides a vivid example of the discretionary powers of an income tax officer, and depicts the process of appeals necessary in tax disputes. The Managing Director of a construction firm moved into second appeal against a tax assessment order that had levied what he felt was excess tax and penalty for concealment of taxable income.en_US
dc.publisherYESen_US
dc.subjectConstruction-
dc.subject.classificationBusiness,Government,International Economyen_US
dc.subject.otherTaxationen_US
dc.subject.otherbusiness lawen_US
dc.titleTAX MAN COMETH (A)en_US
dc.type16-081-91-1en_US
dc.locationcase research centreen_US
Appears in Collections:Business Case Studies

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.