Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/1/499Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Sipra N | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Sharif H L | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T08:16:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T08:16:09Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/175815 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/1/499 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The case provides a vivid example of the discretionary powers of an income tax officer, and depicts the process of appeals necessary in tax disputes. The Managing Director of a construction firm moved into second appeal against a tax assessment order that had levied what he felt was excess tax and penalty for concealment of taxable income. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | YES | en_US |
| dc.subject | Construction | - |
| dc.subject.classification | Business,Government,International Economy | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Taxation | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | business law | en_US |
| dc.title | TAX MAN COMETH (A) | en_US |
| dc.type | 16-081-91-1 | en_US |
| dc.location | case research centre | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Business Case Studies | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.