<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01016nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">52655</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">52655</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780199674183</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">303.4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lewens, Tim</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cultural Evolution : Conceptual Challenges</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Tim Lewens</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UK</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">205 Pages</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">22x14 cm</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">HB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Include Index and References</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This title exposes and evaluates a set of conceptual disputes concerning what we might mean by culture, and how we should go about accounting for it. Its particular focus is a set of evolutionary approaches to the genesis of the human capacity for culture, to subsequent cultural change, and to the ways in which genetic and cultural change interact, or 'co-evolve'. The book as a whole argues that there is little realistic hope that the social sciences might become unified around an evolutionary synthesis. Instead the defence of evolutionary approaches to culture must be more modest in scope.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social evolution</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Culture</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">303_400000000000000_L669C_2015</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">NFIC</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">51203</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">GPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">GPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GEN</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2018-11-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">CRV/GPLM/Oxford/60/2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">2633.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">303.4 L669C 2015</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">58144</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2018-11-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-11-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
